In my last post on March 19th, I told you I’d found a cure for writer’s block, by joining Authonomy.com. My novel-in-progress had been lanquishing on my shelf and the encouragement and suggestions I received from other writers during the past few months helped me improve my book, also unlocking my “writer’s block”. In order to go public (work showing on the site) a writer must upload 10,000 words of their manuscript. I uploaded about 13,000 and my present word count is 37,000.
However, I ran into another block, this one created by the need to spend too much time on the site, reading, commenting and, quite frankly, being affected by the changing ranking numbers based on how much we commented on other books. Two ranking scores are involved. The TSR (Talent Spotting Rank) is based on your ability to choose other writers’ books to place on your “shelf” (you’re allowed five) that other writers also support. If your ranking is high (which means the lowest number) then your support of other books counts more towards the ranking of the book you comment on. Therefore, other writers are more likely to seek your comments by giving comments on your own book.
It also becomes necessary to frequently change the books on your shelf. When favorably commenting on your book, a writer will give it a “spin” on their own shelves. For many writers it reaches a stage of intense competition to get to the Editors Desk. The top five books in ranking (numbers one through 5) reach the Editors Desk each month-end and receive a review by an editor. From the reviews I’ve seen posted it appears some excellent books (most of which I’ve read at least the first few chapters) are said not to be commercial enough.
One interesting one was chosen if the writer would change the actual premise of the book and rewrite it to the editor’s satisfaction, which I understand she is doing. To my understanding this is the first book chosen from the top five since Authonomy began. Another book was chosen to be published from much further down in the ranking (which never reached the ED) but it had been self-published by the author as a POD (print on demand) book before being uploaded.
From estimates I’ve seen there are between 4,000 and 6,000 writers and/or books on the site (some writers have several books) and, from the ranking a writer is first assigned, in the 3,000 range, I would assume there are at least that many active manuscripts.
The higher (meaning lowest number) your book ranking the more you need to read and comment on other books in order to rise further. This is fine if your book is complete and you’re only seeking feedback and suggestions for improvement, but if not, you find less and less time to work on your own.
You hear of people “stopping when they’re ahead” (probably in order to preserve their pride!). My book ranking when I took my book down on July 5th was 178 (it had been as high as 167 I believe). When the book is going up (lower score) it has a green arrow headed up, and when the ranking falls again (to a higher number) the arrow turns down and turns red! This happens frequently to all books – the arrows keep turning green and then red – especially if you’re not getting enough comments and shelf space from other writers. Naturally writers get anxious when the arrows turn red and offer swap reads – “I’ll read yours and comment if you’ll read mine and comment.”
Although I offered no swap reads I accepted them if I looked at the book and thought it something I wanted to read and comment on.
But I decided on July 5th to take my book down so I could have time to work on it. I may re-upload it when it’s complete – or not, depending on whether I wish to at that time. If I do, I have lost my ranking and will start over again at the bottom of the heap.
Also, with its Appalachian background it would probably be called a “niche” book, not likely to sell well (not commercial enough). I’m writing it because I love to write and that is what I write. In other words I write because I have to, whether my book is ever published or not.
I believe there are many other writers on the site who write for the same reason I do and some of them are able to ignore the rankings but it’s hard not to get addicted to that green arrow!
I feel I’ve managed to pull myself away from one more addiction I allowed to take over my life for the past four-plus months. But I gained from it and am glad I had the experience. I bless all the writers there and wish them health and happiness.
Filed under: Authonomy, Writing | 3 Comments »
STORIES OF A KENTUCKY MOUNTAIN FAMILY
Amanda’s Thought for the Day
We’ve all heard that the world is divided into two types of people, the givers and the takers. However, there’s also a third type: the ones who are happy to give yet refuse to be taken. They are the foundation of democracy.
Filed under: Bailout, Thought for the Day, attitudes, politics, social commentary | 1 Comment »